<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Greg's Law &amp; Economics Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gweston.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ponzi-Scheme Whistleblower Ordered By Corrupt Arbitration Panel to Pay a Criminal Organization $107,782 by Stanford Ponzi Covered Up by NASD/FINRA&#8217;s Arbitrators: Part II &#171; Greg&#8217;s Law &#38; Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/ponzi-scheme-whistleblower-ordered-by-corrupt-arbitration-panel-to-pay-a-criminal-organization-107782/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanford Ponzi Covered Up by NASD/FINRA&#8217;s Arbitrators: Part II &#171; Greg&#8217;s Law &#38; Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-359</guid>
		<description>[...] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Ponzi-Scheme Whistleblower Ordered By Corrupt Arbitration Panel to Pay a Cr&#8230;Corrections for my EssayNo TitleWeek of Wonders 15â€&#8221;What about the weekend of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Ponzi-Scheme Whistleblower Ordered By Corrupt Arbitration Panel to Pay a Cr&#8230;Corrections for my EssayNo TitleWeek of Wonders 15â€&rdquo;What about the weekend of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jingle Mail and 2nd Mortgages by josh, la</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/jingle-mail-and-2nd-mortgages/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>josh, la</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-351</guid>
		<description>duarte: im in the exact situation you are. 80/20 foreclosed on. both loans were purchase money loans. i thought the nightmare was over but now collections is calling on the  2nd $120,000 loan. very frustrating! i keep getting different answers to what they are allowd to try to collect. i guess bankruptcy will be the last step in the process</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duarte: im in the exact situation you are. 80/20 foreclosed on. both loans were purchase money loans. i thought the nightmare was over but now collections is calling on the  2nd $120,000 loan. very frustrating! i keep getting different answers to what they are allowd to try to collect. i guess bankruptcy will be the last step in the process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can The Builder Sue Me To Close? California Law on Specific Performance in Residential New Contraction Contracts by Dee</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/re_specific_performance_in_california/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-289</guid>
		<description>What happens you if simply cannot qualify for the loan to purchase the property/condo - are you then entitled to get your deposit back.  This is related to a condo development coming to market this May in San Diego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens you if simply cannot qualify for the loan to purchase the property/condo &#8211; are you then entitled to get your deposit back.  This is related to a condo development coming to market this May in San Diego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can The Builder Sue Me To Close? California Law on Specific Performance in Residential New Contraction Contracts by Pgh buyer</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/re_specific_performance_in_california/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Pgh buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Is there a similar provision in Pennsylvania law?  Can someone provide a good reference or a good lawyer in the Pittsburgh area that can advise on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a similar provision in Pennsylvania law?  Can someone provide a good reference or a good lawyer in the Pittsburgh area that can advise on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ponzi-Scheme Whistleblower Ordered By Corrupt Arbitration Panel to Pay a Criminal Organization $107,782 by Jared Beck</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/ponzi-scheme-whistleblower-ordered-by-corrupt-arbitration-panel-to-pay-a-criminal-organization-107782/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Greg, nicely put.  By taking away people&#039;s day in court, you enable the fraudsters to run rampant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, nicely put.  By taking away people&#8217;s day in court, you enable the fraudsters to run rampant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ponzi-Scheme Whistleblower Ordered By Corrupt Arbitration Panel to Pay a Criminal Organization $107,782 by RexofSanDiegoBusinessClub</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/ponzi-scheme-whistleblower-ordered-by-corrupt-arbitration-panel-to-pay-a-criminal-organization-107782/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>RexofSanDiegoBusinessClub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-255</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see some of that good old fashioned &quot;what&#039;s right&quot; reporting.  Too many people simply allow the bullies to do their dirty work.  We ALL need to stand up to them, and for the victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see some of that good old fashioned &#8220;what&#8217;s right&#8221; reporting.  Too many people simply allow the bullies to do their dirty work.  We ALL need to stand up to them, and for the victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jingle Mail and California Law: Giving the mortgage back to the bank by Hypotheek</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/jingle-mail-and-california-law-giving-the-mortgage-back-to-the-bank/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypotheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-250</guid>
		<description>They can sue and get a judgment after the house is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can sue and get a judgment after the house is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jingle Mail and 2nd Mortgages by Duarte</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/jingle-mail-and-2nd-mortgages/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Duarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I posted a comment on this blog, and it was never published.  What&#039;s the deal Greg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a comment on this blog, and it was never published.  What&#8217;s the deal Greg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jingle Mail and 2nd Mortgages by Jason</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/jingle-mail-and-2nd-mortgages/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Would scenario 3 be the same if originally the home was bought on two loans than refied in two loans? The two new loans are with one bank.  So then if the first forecloses the second can&#039;t come after you later since it is the same company, am I correct?


Regards,


Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would scenario 3 be the same if originally the home was bought on two loans than refied in two loans? The two new loans are with one bank.  So then if the first forecloses the second can&#8217;t come after you later since it is the same company, am I correct?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jingle Mail and 2nd Mortgages by Duarte</title>
		<link>http://gweston.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/jingle-mail-and-2nd-mortgages/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Duarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gweston.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I recently foreclosed on my house in CA, and I had an 80/20 loans, only purchase-money loans, and the second lender is trying to collect now. Apparently, AIG insured the loan (probably paid for by the higher interest rate), and and now AIG is trying to collect. It was a trustee sale, and the second lender was wiped out completely. Now I have a lawyer in Sacramento to help deal with this. The first lender will be lucky to recover 75%. Does anyone else have the same situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently foreclosed on my house in CA, and I had an 80/20 loans, only purchase-money loans, and the second lender is trying to collect now. Apparently, AIG insured the loan (probably paid for by the higher interest rate), and and now AIG is trying to collect. It was a trustee sale, and the second lender was wiped out completely. Now I have a lawyer in Sacramento to help deal with this. The first lender will be lucky to recover 75%. Does anyone else have the same situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
